You are Sunlight and I Moon, Joined by the gods of fortune
Midnight and High Noon, Sharing the sky
We have been blessed--you and I
Now, we instinctively accept Chris as Sun and Kim as Moon because Mythology abounds with the Moon as the Feminine Principle. It is embedded in our psyches as an archetype. Apollo is the Sun god and his twin sister Artemis is the Moon goddess. (In my novel A Place of Brightness, a brother and sister use the code-names Apollo and Diana [Roman Artemis] in their anti-communist insurgency.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecd97/ecd973ab8bac1f4618bbe3e8dd34376568d2b641" alt=""
Now, the Moon as a feminine principle certainly also springs from the parallel of the feminine menstrual cycle, lasting roughly the same as a lunar month.
Artemis, the goddess of the Moon for the Greeks, is a perpetual virgin. She is nonetheless a symbol of fertility, such as we see with the Artemis of Ephesus, a multi-breasted goddess.
It occurs to me that this archetypal paradigm may account for the tendency for modern culture to continuously venerate some current blonde-haired (like the silvery Moon) and large breasted (symbol of fertility) woman, as if offering lunar worship by proxy.
Now, you may ask, if this is the case and if it is true, why just modern culture? Where is the buxom blonde venerated in the Colonial period?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ef3/77ef365b039d4a29c6f993ee2c68e60deaaa2f84" alt=""
Denied the ability to venerate Mary the Mother of God,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78feb/78feba48d084d3b6b79d7abd03d1d5af8e6c1fbc" alt=""
We currently have Lady Gaga.
Now, she is an artificial marketing creation.
And the choice of "Lady" (i.e., Our Lady) was no accident.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfa85/bfa85565bf2256dbad7b420ffa38a80e5f1b5ff5" alt=""
That's actually her given name, and she was raised Catholic.
But by my theory, she would not have been able to tap into the Lunar Archetype if her name had been Brenda.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edb97/edb976efcf5e52f747f5fa09b90d57b1447ffe69" alt=""
Before her, we had Marilyn Monroe. Blonde, buxom, and with a last name that isn't very far from the moon itself. It's certainly also not a coincidence, then, that Elton John memorializes her with the light image of a "Candle in the Wind."
And before her, finally, we had Mae West. She is, perhaps, the first emergence of the Blonde, Beautiful, and Buxom American Superstar. Perhaps I press
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bf49/9bf49a01af1ee424cdea8b33e3a4ec8f1e06b2af" alt=""
Finally, is it possible that even Lady Diana, whose title and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4be5c/4be5cd8c763201e2da8ebf026ee3dace0ec034d7" alt=""
If my theory is correct, that stardom can be achieved or at least maximized by some subconscious appeal to a Jungian Archetype, the implications are staggering. But at the very least, this suggests that, some years after Lady Gaga has worn out her welcome (which, by the way, I wouldn't suggest is any time soon; I actually believe she has genuine talent), the combination of a beautiful, blonde, buxom, starlet with a name that evokes the Mother of God or the pagan Moon goddess will probably yet be a winning formula.
You touch upon a matter of genuine profundity.
ReplyDeleteI have long been a student of folklore, and even of psychoanalysis -- the former now little-known (apart from its latter-day offspring of “urban legend”), the latter in disgrace -- yet never replaced, save by little pills. There is much to dwell upon, in what you say.
A favorite theme of Chesterton is how, when the space that should be occupied by faith is vacant, superstition -- horror vacui -- floods in. And so it may be, when hyperdulia is forgotten, that pagan predecessors well up anew.
Yet much as superstition may be but a twisted simulacrum of genuine faith, so these bottle-blonde divas in no way replace so much as an atom of the Theotokos, nor lead to her. That … G*g* in particular (the keys refuse to write her name) has been linked with practices positively diabolical.
It would be wonderful, really, if all paths led to God -- even the Branch Davidians. But historically, empirically, it seems that they do not.